A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability
By T. Tullis, Jacqueline N. Stetson. 2004
783 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d621a71a9c9e24f689f5263ed5b74e53535374a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Prokopia Vlachogianni
- Philip T. Kortum
- Nikolaos Tselios
- Aaron Bangor
- Valeria Villani
- James T. Miller
- Lorenzo Sabattini
- Beatrice Capelli
Citations in the corpus
- Usability: Lessons Learned … and Yet to Be Learned (2014, unknown): “In a study comparing different standardized usability questionnaires, the SUS was the fastest to converge on its large-sample mean (Tullis & Stetson, 2004).”
- Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review (2021, background): “Third, it has proved to be reliable even with small sample size (Tullis & Stetson, 2004; Sauro, 2013).”
- Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale (2009, methodology): “Tullis and Stetson (2004) measured the usability of two Web sites using five different surveys (including the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction [QUIS], the SUS, the Computer System Usability Questionnaire [CSUQ], and two vendor specific surveys) and found that the SUS provided the…”
- The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future (2018, background): “Research resumes: Tullis and Stetson (2004) and Finstad (2006) At the 2004 conference of the Usability Professionals Association, Tullis and Stetson presented a comparison of standardized usability questionnaires that included the SUS, QUIS, CSUQ, Words (ratings based Microsoft ’ s Product Reaction…”
- Use of Virtual Reality for the Evaluation of Human-Robot Interaction Systems in Complex Scenarios (2018, methodology): “The questionnaire was designed ad hoc for the experiment, adapting that in [21].”
- Visualizing and interacting with large-volume biodiversity data using client-server web-mapping applications: The design and implementation of antmaps.org (2016, unknown): “Tullis and Stetson (2004) carried out a systematic comparison and concluded that the SUS (System Usability Scale) generated the most reliable results across sample sizes (Çöltekin et al., 2009).”