Victims Of Groupthink A Psychological Study Of Foreign Policy Decisions And Fiascoes
By J. Hahn. 2016
772 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d5aa1853bce2de51ced4ffb1034b5d0a224afb8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Rani Hoitash
- Udi Hoitash
- E. Hafner-Burton
- Anthony OʼHagan
- Robert A. Baron
- David A. Lake
- Stephan Haggard
- David G. Victor
Citations in the corpus
- Revisiting the Foundations of Organizational Distrust (2017, neutral): “A few early studies (Janis, 1972; Lewicki et al., 1998) have indicated that looking only at the positive side of actions may result in detrimental thought patterns such as group-think, whereas others (Bromiley and Cummings, 1995; Dunn, 1988) suggested that looking only at the negative side can paral”
- A Review of Multilevel Regulatory Focus in Organizations (2015, background): “For example, the self-regulatory effects of CRF on team decisions could provide insight into the operationalization of groupthink in teams (Janis, 1972).”
- The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations (2017, background): “Janis 1972. nonstandard preferences, beliefs, and decision making.”
- Industry expertise on corporate boards (2017, positive): “The psychology literature (e.g., Janis 1972; McCauley 1989) suggests that similarities in the backgrounds of group members can reduce the quality of group decisions via groupthink.”
- How Does Social Media Impact Bitcoin Value? A Test of the Silent Majority Hypothesis (2018, background): “Third, the silent majority users are less likely to engage in groupthink [25], defined as self-deception, wishful thinking, and conformity to group values that lead to willful blindness and collective denial [3].”
- Expert Knowledge Elicitation: Subjective but Scientific (2019, background): “Another feature of expert groups, which might be called a group heuristic, is a tendency for discussion to be restricted to ideas that will be broadly acceptable to all the group members, a behavior known as groupthink (Janis 1972).”
- Air pollution, affect, and forecasting bias: Evidence from Chinese financial analysts (2019, neutral): “On the one hand, “groupthink” can lead to magnification of individual biases (see, e.g., Janis, 1972 for a classic reference).”