The HOPE VI Program: What about the residents?

By S. Popkin, D. Levy, Laura E. Harris, J. Comey, M. Cunningham, Larry F. Buron. 2004

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d3ba24e5506d4d87ce05f49ca2534d9fbc2bb06

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Keri B. Burchfield
2. D. Oakley
3. A. Curley
4. E. Talen
5. G. Duncan
6. Stefanie DeLuca

In General Health Professions

1. Keri B. Burchfield
2. D. Oakley
3. A. Curley
4. E. Talen
5. G. Duncan

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Stefanie DeLuca
2. Keri B. Burchfield
3. D. Oakley
4. A. Curley
5. E. Talen
6. G. Duncan
7. Ruby Mendenhall

Citations in the corpus

• Draining or gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston (2009, background): “Overall, the general pattern of losing supportive ties after relocation fits with what other research has shown about the detrimental effects of relocation on people’s social networks (e.g., Gans, 1962, and more recent HOPE VI studies, Clampet-Lundquist, 2004; Greenbaum, 2002; Popkin et al., 2004).”
• Neighborhood resources, racial segregation, and economic mobility: Results from the Gautreaux program (2006, background): “With the demolition of public housing in Chicago and other cities, policy makers struggle with how best to invest housing resources to improve the life chances of both children and adults (Epp, 1996; Orlebeke, 2000; Popkin et al., 2004; Schill and Wachter, 2001; Schwartz and Tajbakhsh, 1997; Venka”
• Out of the Projects, Still in the Hood: The Spatial Constraints on Public-Housing Residents’ Relocation in Chicago (2009, methodology): “…Opportunities for People Everywhere) Program was created by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to demolish large, spatially concentrated high-rise developments and replace them with mixed-income housing, thus deconcentrating poverty (Popkin et al., 2004a; Smith, 2002).”
• Design That Enables Diversity: The Complications of a Planning Ideal (2006, background): “…mix housing types and create socially diverse neighborhoods have been generally positive, although there are complaints that the projects do not always go far enough (Popkin et al. 2004), and that mixed-income housing should not be seen as a “silver bullet” that overcomes poverty (A. Smith 2002).”
• Relocating the Poor: Social Capital and Neighborhood Resources (2010, background): “Furthermore, HOPE VI researchers have found that relocation often breaks up strong social networks, which could reduce access to social support—another important form of social capital (Clampet-Lundquist, 2004; Curley, 2009; Greenbaum, 2002; Popkin et al., 2004; Saegert & Winkel, 1998).”