Neighborhood resources, racial segregation, and economic mobility: Results from the Gautreaux program

By Ruby Mendenhall, Stefanie DeLuca, G. Duncan. 2006

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91cf66a1e73ecc4930e7de41e9f34cf9cc976db9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In General Health Professions

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Converging Evidence for Neighborhood Effects on Children's Test Scores: An Experimental, Quasi-experimental, and Observational Comparison* (2010, unknown): “Some of those apartments were in areas of Chicago that were poor and segregated, but improving, while others were able to get apartments in low-poverty, predominantly white or integrated suburban areas (Mendenhall, DeLuca, and Duncan 2006).”
Neighborhood Effects on Economic Self‐Sufficiency: A Reconsideration of the Moving to Opportunity Experiment1 (2008, unknown): “…of the earlier comparison with Gautreaux, it could be argued that we should have measured the use of the voucher in the suburbs; however, our focus on the combination of racial composition and class is in line with Mendenhall et al. (2006), who did not find the city/suburb contrast to be salient.”
What Can We Learn about Neighborhood Effects from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment?1 (2008, background): “16 Mendenhall et al. (2006) find that, compared to suburban movers, city movers in Gautreaux have slightly older children (measured by age of youngest child), are more likely to live in public housing at baseline, and generally come from more disadvantaged and dangerous baseline neighborhoods. Votru”
Does Moving to Better Neighborhoods Lead to Better Schooling Opportunities? Parental School Choice in an Experimental Housing Voucher Program (2010, background): “…areas with the Gautreaux program were more likely to still live in such communities, were less likely to be on welfare, were more likely to be employed, and earned slightly more than those who relocated to less advantaged communities (DeLuca and Rosenbaum 2003; Mendenhall, DeLuca, and Duncan 2006).”