Determining Sample Size for Research Activities

By H. Ahmad, H. Halim. 2017

8,924 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d34951c328c02c062d829f7e3c2ebf657b9d031

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

To Type or Not to Type: Quantifying Detectable Bugs in JavaScript (2017, unknown): “3) Corpus: To report results that generalize to the population of public bugs, we used the standard sample size computation to determine the number of bugs needed to achieve a speciﬁed conﬁdence interval [16].”
The Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Job Performance via the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction (2016, methodology): “…number of constructs and variables within the model and after eliminating the incomplete surveys, our sample size of 354 respondents meets the recommended guidelines of Kline (2010), Krejcie and Morgan (1970) and Pallant (2005) by exceeding the recommended sample of 346 on the population of 3500.”
The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers' purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption (2016, background): “The sample size of 384 is considered appropriate when the population constitutes millions (at 95% confidence level and 5% margin of error) (Krejcie & Morgan, 1970; Sekaran, 2006).”
Research Design and Methods: A Systematic Review of Research Paradigms, Sampling Issues and Instruments Development (2018, background): “Authors like Krejcie and Morgan [24] have stated that if the given population was 1000000 then the required sample size would have to be 384.”
Intellectual capital and organisational performance in Malaysian knowledge-intensive SMEs (2017, background): “This endeavour yielded a final sample size of 237 respondents from 77 SMEs and a resultant individual response rate of 43% representing 51% of all SMEs which is sufficient (Krejcie and Morgan, 1970).”
Sample Size and Its Role in Central Limit Theorem (CLT) (2018, methodology): “The general rule relative to acceptable margins of error in educational and social research is as follows: For categorical data, 5% margin of error is acceptable, and, for continuous data, 3% margin of error is acceptable (Krejcie and Morgan, 1970).”
Relationship between quality of work life and organizational commitment among lecturers in a Malaysian public research university (2015, methodology): “The second section was dedicated to the Likert Scale questionnaire and contains 47 questions which each 29 questions are determining QWL according to Walton theory that there are 8 dimensions in this regard: (1) Adequate and fair compensation, (2) Safe and healthy working conditions, (3) Immediate o”
Exploring Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning Through the Development of a Comprehensive Technology Acceptance Model (2019, methodology): “[95] R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, ‘‘Determining sample size for research activities,’’ Edu.”
Sample Size Determination in Survey Research (2020, methodology): “Krejcie and Morgan [6] recommended the use of .”
Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies (2020, background): “In addition, considering the variety of the research types and characteristics, it should be noted that a great number of calculations will be required with too many variables (Table 1) (16,24-30).”
The impact of human resource management practices and career satisfaction on employee’s turnover intention (2020, unknown): “According to the table of Krejcie and Morgan (1970), a sample size of 377-379 should be obtained from participants ranging from 20000-30000.”
Examining the links between teachers support, academic efficacy, academic resilience, and student engagement in Bahrain (2018, methodology): “Following the Krejcie and Morgan (1970) table, the minimum required sample for the study turned out to be 331.”
Risk, trust, and the interaction of perceived ease of use and behavioral control in predicting consumers' use of social media for transactions (2018, unknown): “(See, e.g., Krejcie & Morgan, 1970).”