Hunter feedback of individually marked wild boar Sus scrofa L.: dispersal and efficiency of hunting in northeastern Germany

By O. Keuling, Kirstin Lauterbach, N. Stier, M. Roth. Zeitschrift f\ ur Jagdwissenschaft, 2010

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d1d40fb7bee4bafdefc65f44af302b6581d76ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. O. Keuling
2. N. Stier
3. M. Roth
4. S. Kramer‐Schadt
5. A. Frantz
6. G. Ericsson
7. G. Spong
8. Henrik Thurfjell

In Small Animals

1. O. Keuling
2. N. Stier
3. M. Roth
4. G. Ericsson
5. G. Spong
6. Henrik Thurfjell

Citations in the corpus

• How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.? (2008, methodology): “Some authors describe different models to accomplish regulation of wild boar populations by hunting different proportions of age classes (Bieber and Ruf 2005; Servanty et al. 2005; Sodeikat et al. 2005; Servanty 2008; Keuling et al. 2010).”
• Do cities represent sources, sinks or isolated islands for urban wild boar population structure? (2017, background): “Wild boar show very flexible behaviour (Keuling, Stier & Roth 2008; Keuling et al. 2010) and can quickly adapt to the life in urban areas (Cahill et al. 2012; Podgorski et al. 2013).”