On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention

By Jan Theeuwes, P. Atchley, A. Kramer. 2000

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d1b62bf3f5bdde04373aa02f84d5c5d18012339

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Roger W. Remington
2. C. Folk
3. Jan Theeuwes

Citations in the corpus

• Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention (2013, background): “On the one hand, the apparent lack of salience-driven selection in the cueing paradigm has been attributed to rapid disengagement of attention from cue singletons that are easily distinguishable from the target (Theeuwes, Atchley, & Kramer, 2000).”
• Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues (2007, positive): “Theeuwes, Atchley, and Kramer (2000) investigated the time course of disengagement of a (visible) distractor that captured attention in a visual search task by using different SOAs between distractor and target and by manipulating the congruence between them.”
• What speakers do and what addressees look at: visual attention to gestures in human interaction live and on video (2006, neutral): “The visual search paradigm typically stresses the importance of motion, abrupt onset, and size as factors that operate pre-attentively in a low-level, bottom-up fashion (e.g. Theeuwes, Atchley and Kramer 2000; Wolfe 1998).”
• Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture (2006, methodology): “First, Theeuwes, Atchley, and Kramer (2000) used the additional singleton paradigm, but varied the timing of the distractor singleton’s onset relative to target onset.”
• Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials (2008, neutral): “…a transient attention shift might have been triggered to the location of colour singleton cues in the onset task of Experiment 1, and in the size task of Experiment 2, followed by rapid attentional disengagement (as postulated by Theeuwes et al., 2000), without this being reflected by an N2pc.”
• Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. (2010, background): “In our study (Theeuwes et al., 2000) we demonstrated that in the additional”