Relational quality and communicative responses following hurtful events in dating relationships: An expectancy violations analysis

By G. Bachman, Laura K. Guerrero. 2006

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cdb3e226c482bfa06f6d8183e66faa03de87b7d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Melanie Booth‐Butterfield
2. Sean M. Horan

In Social Psychology

1. Aimee E. Miller-Ott
2. Melanie Booth‐Butterfield
3. Sean M. Horan
4. Lynne Kelly

Citations in the corpus

• The Presence of Cell Phones in Romantic Partner Face-to-Face Interactions: An Expectancy Violation Theory Approach (2015, background): “…relational escalation are the primary goals of first dates (Mongeau et al., 2004), a partner’s overuse of the cell phone is likely interpreted as intentional, and perceived intent has been found to impact communicative responses to hurtful events in dating relationships (Bachman & Guerrero, 2006).”
• Ready, AIM, Acquire: Impression Offsetting and Acquisitions (2015, background): “…observers perceive intentionality on the part of the actor, the magnitude of an expectancy violation, whether positive or negative, is amplified (Bachman & Guerrero, 2006).1 In an effort to manage perceptions of—and reactions to—negative expectancy violations, firms engage in impression…”
• Norm evolution and violation on Facebook (2012, background): “In addition, this study provides more insight into the phenomenon of negatively valenced norm violations for positive figures and provides an interesting perspective on the findings of Bachman and Guerrero (2006) regarding fighting couples.”
• Investing in Affection: An Investigation of Affection Exchange Theory and Relational Qualities (2010, background): “In addition, Bachman and Guerrero ( 2006 ) reported that secure individuals used more romantic affection compared to avoidant individuals, and Floyd ( 2002 ) found that highly affectionate communicators were more likely to have a secure attachment style.”