Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete

By T. Tsoutsos, Maria Drandaki, Niki Frantzeskaki, E. Iosifidis, I. Kiosses. 2009

338 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Pollution, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cd741f81c5ea898c7295d1a9d978fb272d9ccf4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
2. F. Ribeiro
3. Yan Deng
4. Paula F. V. Ferreira
5. Maria Madalena T. de Araújo
6. Praveen Kumar

In Pollution

1. F. Ribeiro
2. Paula F. V. Ferreira
3. Maria Madalena T. de Araújo
4. Dalia Streimikiene

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
2. Dalia Streimikiene
3. Dragan Pamucar
4. Abbas Mardani

Citations in the corpus

• A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development (2017, background): “MCDM is considered as an evaluation structure to solve environmental, socio-economic, technical, and institutional barriers involved in energy planning [22].”
• Application of MCDM Methods in Sustainability Engineering: A Literature Review 2008-2018 (2019, methodology): “[109], the selection of an optimum renewable energy source in Crete, Greece was carried out with the PROMETHEE I and PROMETHEE II methods.”
• An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Dealing with Sustainable Energy Development Issues (2018, background): “AHP, ANP [16–21] [21–25] [18,19,26–34] [19,35,36] [17,37–40] [22,26,31,35,36,41–43] Fuzzy Sets [18,19,44] [22,24,45–47] [18,26,27,31,32,48–56] [19] [38,57,58] [26,31] [59] TOPSIS [44,60,61] [59] [31,32,34,49,60,62–65] [61] [38] [31] [59,66] WASPAS, WASPAS-G [61,67] [61,67] [67] PROMETHEE PROMETHEE I”