Correction: Survival of Migrating Salmon Smolts in Large Rivers With and Without Dams

By D. W. Welch, E. Rechisky, M. Melnychuk, A. D. Porter, Carl J Walters, Shaun P. Clements, Benjamin J. Clemens, R. McKinley, C. Schreck. PLoS Biology, 2008

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Correction for: Welch DW, Rechisky EL, Melnychuk MC, Porter AD, Walters CJ, et al. (2008) Survival of migrating salmon smolts in large rivers with and without dams. PLoS Biol 6(10): e265 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060265 In the legend below Table 1, the reference given at the end of the second sentence is incorrect. The sentence should read: “Annual survival (S) to the lowest listening line in the Fraser River, whole-river survival in the Columbia River (2006), and associated detection efficiencies (p) were calculated using the CJS model and program MARK [28]”

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cca3a10a30a46ab7cde61f88701ed1fc1490226

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Predicting establishment success for introduced freshwater fishes: a role for climate matching (2010, background): “…establishing in climatically suitable areas, although the role of biotic resistance is controversial and the presence of previously introduced species may even facilitate establishment success (Moyle and Light 1996a; Ricciardi 2001; Kennedy et al. 2002; Fridley et al. 2007; Leprieur et al. 2008).”
Non-native species and invasion biology in a megadiverse country: scientometric analysis and ecological interactions in Brazil (2016, background): “…countries, is located where native biodiversity is high with respect to multiple aspects, including a variety of phylogenetic and functional types (Leprieur et al. 2008; Toussaint et al. 2016), that provide a range of ecosystem services that benefit different sectors of human society (e.g.…”
Defining conservation priorities for freshwater fishes according to taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity (2011, background): “…nonnative and native species into conservation scenarios, as the Lower Colorado River Basin has the dubious distinction of being a global invasion hotspot (Leprieur et al. 2008), where the number of nonnative fish species are more than double the number of native species (Olden and Poff 2005).”
Worldwide freshwater fish homogenization is driven by a few widespread non-native species (2016, background): “Human activities have strongly altered species composition and richness of the freshwater ecosystems over the world (Vitousek 1997; Butchart et al. 2010; Leprieur et al. 2008a).”
A global assessment of freshwater fish introductions in mediterranean-climate regions (2013, background): “The introduction of non-native fishes has resulted in the loss of faunal uniqueness of these regions while increasing the total number of fish species (see also Leprieur et al., 2008; Marr et al., 2010).”