Response thresholds to sucrose predict foraging division of labor in honeybees

By T. Pankiw, R. Page. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2000

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cc1719699bb967f5b183fa58b4f947b38ea40cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Insect Science

Citations in the corpus

Adaptation, Genetic Drift, Pleiotropy, and History in the Evolution of Bee Foraging Behavior (2006, background): “, 1998), and the authors conjecture that this might explain their higher relative acceptance level for poor nectar quality (Pankiw and Page, 2000).”
Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size (2007, background): “2004), undertaking (Robinson and Page 1988), and foraging in honey bees (Pankiw and Page 2000; Fewell and Page 2000), as well as nest moving (Meudec 1979) and foraging (Stuart and Page 1991) in ants.”
Genotype and colony environment affect honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) development and foraging behavior (2001, unknown): “A division of labor occurs as a consequence of a distribution of response thresholds among individuals in a colony resulting in differential behavioral responses to task-releasing stimuli ( Pankiw and Page 2000 ).”
Influence of colony genotypic composition on the performance of hygienic behaviour in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. (2001, background): “…Frumhoff & Baker 1988; Robinson & Page 1988, 1989; Rothenbuhler & Page 1989; Breed et al. 1990), response thresholds of workers to task stimulus (Page 1997; Page et al. 1998; Theraulaz et al. 1998; Pankiw & Page 2000) and the demand for task performance (Tofts & Franks 1992; Franks & Tofts 1994).”
The control of nest climate in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) colonies: interindividual variability and self reinforcement in fanning response (2004, background): “…have been shown to differ between individuals (Seeley, 1994), and a correlation has been found between the threshold concentration of sucrose solution for extending the proboscis in honey bees and forager preferences for water, nectar, or pollen (Page et al., 1998; Pankiw and Page, 1999, 2000).”
Models of division of labor in social insects. (2001, background): “Response thresholds in workers that were not yet foraging were shown to correlate with later resource preferences and selectivity when these same workers began to forage (83).”
The principles of collective animal behaviour (2006, background): “From only one week old, before they have left the hive for the first time, honey bees have different levels of response to sucrose, which later in life determines their propensity to collect water, nectar and pollen (Pankiw & Page 2000).”
A Study of AI Population Dynamics with Million-agent Reinforcement Learning (2017, background): “Variation Social insects as honey bees are evolved to be highly variable in the directional sense, response to sucrose, level of focus in food collection in order to ensure the diversi cation in ways of food collection, otherwise one single food resource will be depleted quickly [22, 39].”
An Empirical Study of AI Population Dynamics with Million-agent Reinforcement Learning (2017, background): “ in the directional sense, response to sucrose, level of focus in food collection in ordertoensurethediversicationinwaysoffood collection, otherwise one single food resource will be depleted quickly [22, 39]. Response Threshold Bumble bees will start to fan so as to cool down the hive when the tempe”
The Development and Evolution of Division of Labor and Foraging Specialization in a Social Insect (Apis mellifera L.) (2006, background): “Pankiw and Page (2000) tested wild type bees for their responses to water and sucrose within their first week of adult life, before they initiated foraging.”