Influence of colony genotypic composition on the performance of hygienic behaviour in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L.

By H. Arathi, M. Spivak. 2001

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3badf682127e9456d5d0e55422acbaf3f94153c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Ricarda Scheiner
2. J. Erber
3. R. Page
4. J. Fewell
5. B. Baer
6. Susan M. Bertram
7. Anja Weidenmüller

In Genetics

1. Ricarda Scheiner
2. J. Erber
3. R. Page
4. J. Fewell
5. B. Baer
6. Root Gorelick
7. Anja Weidenmüller

In Insect Science

1. Ricarda Scheiner
2. J. Erber
3. R. Page
4. J. Fewell
5. B. Baer
6. Anja Weidenmüller

Citations in the corpus

• Sucrose responsiveness and behavioral plasticity in honey bees (Apis mellifera) (2004, background): “A widely accepted hypothesis regards “threshold models” as the basis for division of labor in social insects (Calderone and Page, 1988; Robinson and Page, 1989; Robinson, 1992; Bonabeau et al., 1996; Theraulaz et al., 1998; Arathi and Spivak, 2001; Beshers and Fewell, 2001).”
• Bumblebees as model organisms to study male sexual selection in social insects (2003, background): “Paternal effects are also present in other species (Robinson 1992) such as honeybees, where patrilines differ in cleaning behavior (Arathi and Spivak 2001), nest defence (Degrandi Hoffman et al.”
• Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size (2007, background): “alter the ontogeny and persistence of task specialization (Arathi and Spivak 2001).”