Phylogenetic Relatedness Limits Co‐occurrence at Fine Spatial Scales: Evidence from the Schoenoid Sedges (Cyperaceae: Schoeneae) of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa

By Jasper A. Slingsby, G. Anthony Verboom. American Naturalist, 2006

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cbcf25c56163068d33896f9f8ec8a96511421d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach (2011, background): “…associated with high species richness and endemism might indicate hotspots of recent adaptive radiation (e.g. Cape floristic region of South Africa and oceanic archipelagos such as Hawaii) that were formed by sympatric species that subsequently diversified extensively (Slingsby & Verboom, 2006).”
Phylogenetic community structure in Minnesota oak savanna is influenced by spatial extent and environmental variation (2009, background): “Quantile regression analysis does not require constant variance and has the advantage of permitting the analysis to focus on the upper bound of the data, reducing the bias of zero cooccurrence between many species pairs (Slingsby and Verboom 2006).”
Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory (2012, background): “…2010 Traits and phylogeny Serengeti grasslandsa o, u Anderson et al. 2011 Algerian Xeric communities u Pavoine et al. 2011 Cape Floristic region o Slingsby & Verboom 2006 Dutch plant communitiesa o, u Prinzing et al. 2008 Mediterranean communitiesa (Spain) o, u Verdu & Pausas 2007, Ojeda et…”
Trait Evolution, Community Assembly, and the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities (2007, background): “…and Bohannan 2006) are phylogenetically more closely related than expected by chance, while co-occurring species of Florida Quercus (CavenderBares et al. 2004), California Ceanothus (Ackerly et al. 2006), and South African sedges (Slingsby and Verboom 2006) are more distantly related than expected.”
Testing the spatial phylogenetic structure of local communities: statistical performances of different null models and test statistics on a locally neutral community (2008, background): “2004, 2006; Kembel & Hubbell 2006; Horner-Devine & Bohannan 2006; Slingsby & Verboom 2006; Hardy & Senterre 2007; Helmus et al .”
Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. (2008, background): “…I do not consider studies that use morphological surrogates for ecology (e.g. Böhning-Gaese et al. 2003; Ackerly et al. 2006; Kerkhoff et al. 2006; Slingsby & Verboom 2006; Swenson et al. 2007) because morphology does not necessarily predict ecology, and most studies do not investigate the…”
Diversidades filogenética e funcional: novas abordagens para a Ecologia de comunidades (2009, background): “Estudos conduzidos em pequenas escalas têm encontrado uma dispersão filogenética das plantas coocorrentes (Cavender-Bares et al. 2004, 2006, Slingsby & Verboom 2006).”
Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. (2010, background): “…consequence, the competition-relatedness hypothesis still underlies numerous phylogeny-based analyses of the roles that competition and environmental factors play in regulating community assembly (Slingsby & Verboom 2006; Swenson et al. 2006; Prinzing et al. 2008; Cavender-Bares et al. 2009).”