Liquidity Constraints, Household Wealth, and Entrepreneurship Revisited

By R. Fairlie, Harry Krashinsky. Social Science Research Network, 2012

291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A large body research shows a positive relationship between wealth and entrepreneurship and interprets the relationship as providing evidence of liquidity constraints. Recently, however, the liquidity constraint interpretation has been challenged because of the finding that the relationship between business entry rates and assets is flat throughout most of the asset distribution and only rises dramatically after this point (Hurst and Lusardi 2004). We reexamine the liquidity constraint hypothesis in three ways. First, we demonstrate that examining the relationship separately for those who experience a job loss and those who do not reveals generally increasing entry rates through the wealth distribution for both groups. Based on the entrepreneurial choice model of Evans and Jovanovic (1989), these two groups face different incentives, and thus have different solutions to the entrepreneurial decision. We also find evidence of a stronger relationship between entrepreneurship and a different measure of wealth – net housing equity – for the two groups. Second, we examine the liquidity constraint hypothesis using a two-period simulation model that extends the Evans and Jovanovic (1989) model. The model shows how exogenous wealth shocks can be used to accurately identify the presence of liquidity constraints even allowing for endogenous saving and correlated abilities. Third, we provide new evidence from matched Current Population Survey (1993-2004) data to study whether changes in housing prices affect self-employment entry.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c9d46dcaa858e776d6a24a4957aefec7b7bf7d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Simon C. Parker
  2. Magnus Lofstrom
  3. R. Fairlie
  4. Manuel Adelino
  5. Timothy Bates
  6. Antoinette Schoar
  7. Felipe Severino
  8. Andrew Henley

In Management of Technology and Innovation

  1. Simon C. Parker
  2. R. Fairlie
  3. Magnus Lofstrom
  4. Manuel Adelino
  5. Antoinette Schoar
  6. Gavin Cassar
  7. Taehyun Ahn
  8. Maria Minniti

Citations in the corpus