Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance
By H. Grupp, Torben Schubert. 2010
254 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c924e1ca2cf08d80cf8bf76a1951a78fde8f8ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Alessio Ishizaka
- Menelaos Tasiou
- Gianpiero Torrisi
- Juergen Janger
- Salvatore Greco
- Benedetto Matarazzo
- Petra Andries
- Torben Schubert
In Political Science and International Relations
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness (2018, background): “Moreover, if the procedure followed is not clear and reasonably justified to everyone, there is considerable room for manipulation of the outcome (Grupp and Mogee 2004; Grupp and Schubert 2010).”
- The EU 2020 Innovation Indicator: A Step Forward in Measuring Innovation Outputs and Outcomes? (2017, background): “The problem of weights used in composite indicators has been discussed elsewhere (e.g., Grupp and Schubert, 2010) 16 It should be noted that some data problems are present in our analyses.”
- Stochastic multi-attribute acceptability analysis (SMAA): an application to the ranking of Italian regions (2018, background): “Nonetheless, these issues are still in great need of consideration; especially when something as crucial as a policy is to be drawn on the basis of a synthetic measure that could easily be ‘manipulated’ (Grupp and Schubert, 2010; Abberger et al., 2017).”