Active and passive environmental DNA surveillance of aquatic invasive species

By M. Simmons, Andrew J. Tucker, W. L. Chadderton, C. Jerde, A. Mahon. 2016

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42313477ab22c9ef8830eeb59c894310403b1b99

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Julian D. Olden
2. H. MacIsaac
3. M. Cristescu
4. David M. Lodge
5. John M. Drake
6. M. Barnes
7. Reuben P. Keller
8. Aibin Zhan

In Molecular Biology

1. M. Cristescu
2. M. Barnes
3. C. Jerde
4. H. MacIsaac
5. Aibin Zhan
6. E. E. Sigsgaard
7. W. L. Chadderton
8. S. Cooke

Citations in the corpus

• Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management (2016, background): “Most recently, high-throughput sequencing of eDNA enables surveillance for all potentially invasive (as well as native) species, including those that are unexpected (114).”
• Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities (2017, unknown): “This broader untargeted approach is called “passive” surveillance in management applications (Figure 4; Simmons et al., 2015).”
• Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity (2018, background): “…towards detection of eDNA for a single species of interest can be contrasted with ‘passive’ surveillance, using high-throughput sequencing, whereby sampled eDNA is used to assess community composition and opportunistically reveals the presence of a species of interest (Simmons et al. , 2016).”
• Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter (2017, methodology): “…sensitive technique for revealing species distributions (e.g. Jane et al. 2015; Valentini et al. 2016), early detection of invasive species (e.g. Smart et al. 2015; Simmons et al. 2016) and monitoring rare and/or threatened species for conservation (e.g. Zhan et al. 2013; McKee et al. 2015).”
• Early detection of aquatic invaders using metabarcoding reveals a high number of non‐indigenous species in Canadian ports (2016, methodology): “, 2013) or as environmental DNA typically extracted from soil or water (e.g. Thomsen et al., 2012; Porco et al., 2013; Simmons et al., 2015).”