Phonetic Biases in Voice Key Response Time Measurements

By Brett Kessler, Rebecca Treiman, John W. Mullennix. 2002

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c3265af6b933f056a394f4dcf8e8ac18de7a3b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French (2007, background): “Since the present material was aimed at testing both lexical decision (this experiment) and shadowing (Experiments 2 and 3), the differences in the articulatory requirements for producing different sounds, as well as for the difficulties at detecting different sounds with the voice key were controll”
The English Lexicon Project (2007, background): “Freq_KF refers to the Ku era and Francis (1967) frequency norms.”
The visual word form area and the frequency with which words are encountered: evidence from a parametric fMRI study (2004, background): “As shown by Kesler et al. (2002), initial consonants with one or more of the features obstruent, posterior, and voiceless resulted in delayed voice key response.”
Age-related effects on speech production: A review (2006, background): “2 Some studies have shown that there are biases in how specific phonemes influence voice onsets and in how reliably voice onsets are detected by a voice key (Kessler, Treiman, & Mullennix, 2002 ; Rastle & Davis, 2002 ).”
Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. (2004, background): “There have recently been some initial examinations of speeded naming performance on large sets of English words (e.g., Balota & Spieler, 1998; Besner & Bourassa, 1995; Kessler, Treiman, & Mullennix, 2002; Spieler & Balota, 1997; Trieman, Mullennix, Bijeljac-Babic, & Richmond-Welty, 1995).”
Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words (2009, background): “Hence, it is possible that phonetic bias effects, which have been a source of concern in speeded pronunciation experiments (Kessler et al., 2002), may play a more subtle role in multisyllabic word recognition.”
The Impact of Intensive Mindfulness Training on Attentional Control, Cognitive Style, and Affect (2008, methodology): “Consistent with previous research, in order to control for the effect of outliers, RTs faster than 200 ms were discarded as outliers, based on the assumption that they are outside the typical and acceptable range of processing of word-stimuli (e.g. Kessler, Treiman, & Mullennix, 2002 ).”
Onset Entropy Matters – Letter-to-phoneme Mappings in Seven Languages (2005, methodology): “However, with this method we could not correct for all phonetic biases, as Kessler et al. (2002) showed that for example even the acoustic properties of the second”