New Measures of Well-Being
By E. Diener, Derrick Wirtz, R. Biswas-Diener, William Tov, Chu Kim-prieto, Dong-won Choi, S. Oishi. 2009
887 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Health, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c0ad5d27b35ff007f6cfe941fed9880dc753924
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- E. Diener
- Bulent Baki Telef
- R. Biswas-Diener
- S. Oishi
- Ulla Kinnunen *
- William Tov
- T. Feldt
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
In Health
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Putting the ‘app’ in Happiness: A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-Based Mindfulness Intervention to Enhance Wellbeing (2016, methodology): “The Flourishing scale (Diener et al. 2009) comprising of eight statements, was created to measure social–psychological prosperity and is mostly used to complement prevailing measures of subjective wellbeing.”
- A fully automated conversational agent for promoting mental well-being: A pilot RCT using mixed methods (2017, background): “The FS (previously The Psychological Well-Being scale) is a brief 8-item summary measure of the respondent's self-perceived success in important areas such as relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism (Diener et al., 2009).”
- A mixed-method approach to the assessment of teachers’ emotions: development and validation of the Teacher Emotion Questionnaire (2018, background): “87); and (b) the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (Diener et al., 2009), which is a 12-item questionnaire including six items to measure positive feelings (e.”
- Validation of the Italian Versions of the Flourishing Scale and of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (2017, result): “Contrary to the PANAS, the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) is able to assess the full set of feelings felt by the respondent, both general and specific (Diener et al., 2009).”
- The Adaptation of Psychological Well-Being into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study (2013, methodology): “In the study, an accurate Turkish equivalent of the word ‘flourishing’ could not be found, so the scale was called ‘psychological well-being’ which was used in the first study by Diener et al. (2009).”
- Subjective Well-Being: A General Overview (2009, methodology): “More longitudinal work is required with other forms of assessment in addition to self-report, such as informant reports (see Diener et al., 2009 for a review of measures).”
- Resilience and perceived self-efficacy in life skills from early to late adolescence (2020, background): “2015; Sobhi-Gharamaleki & Rajabi, 2010). For example, Kazemi et al. (2014) found that the experimental group of primary school children with dyscalculia had a significant increase in the self-esteem INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE AND YOUTH 887”
- New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings (2010, background): “We presented these scales earlier in a book chapter (Diener et al. 2009), but the current sample is larger.”
- The mediating role of place attachment between nature connectedness and human well-being: perspectives from Japan (2019, methodology): “Psychological WellBeing scale or Flourishing scale (PWB; Diener et al. 2009) is a eudaimonic measure that asks the respondents to which extent they agree or disagree with a series of statements like “I lead a purposeful and meaningful life”.”
- The longitudinal development of employee well-being: a systematic review (2016, background): “Here, we focus on affective well-being (Warr, 2007), as it is widely considered to be the core of well-being (Diener et al., 2009) and mental health (Keyes, 2005).”