Identifying the consequences of ocean sprawl for sedimentary habitats
By E. Heery, Melanie J. Bishop, L. Critchley, A. Bugnot, L. Airoldi, M. Mayer‐Pinto, E. Sheehan, R. A. Coleman, Lynette H. L. Loke, E. Johnston and 5 more. 2017
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Extensive development and construction in marine and coastal systems is driving a phenomenon known as “ocean sprawl”. Ocean sprawl removes or transforms marine habitats through the addition of artificial structures and some of the most significant impacts are occurring in sedimentary environments. Marine sediments have substantial social, ecological, and economic value, as they are rich in biodiversity, crucial to fisheries productivity, and major sites of nutrient transformation. Yet the impact of ocean sprawl on sedimentary environments has largely been ignored. Here we review current knowledge of the impacts to sedimentary ecosystems arising from artificial structures. Artificial structures alter the composition and abundance of a wide variety of sediment-dependent taxa, including microbes, invertebrates, and benthic-feeding fishes. The effects vary by structure design and configuration, as well as the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the environment in which structures are placed. The mechanisms driving effects from artificial structures include placement loss, habitat degradation, modification of sound and light conditions, hydrodynamic changes, organic enrichment and material fluxes, contamination, and altered biotic interactions. Most studies have inferred mechanism based on descriptive work, comparing biological and physical processes at various distances from structures. Further experimental studies are needed to identify the relative importance of multiple mechanisms and to demonstrate causal relationships. Additionally, past studies have focused on impacts at a relatively small scale, and independently of other development that is occurring. There is need to quantify large-scale and cumulative effects on sedimentary ecosystems as artificial structures proliferate. We highlight the importance for comprehensive monitoring using robust survey designs and outline research strategies needed to understand, value, and protect marine sedimentary ecosystems in the face of a rapidly changing environment.
Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61a9759dfc7f3d35432277b5218bf5e6ab3a10cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- S. Hawkins
- Louise B. Firth
- L. Airoldi
- K. Dafforn
- Lynette H. L. Loke
- S. Connell
- David R. Schiel
- F. Bulleri
In Oceanography
- Louise B. Firth
- S. Hawkins
- M. Mayer‐Pinto
- L. Naylor
- Melanie J. Bishop
- L. Airoldi
- R. Morris
- Lynette H. L. Loke
Citations in the corpus
- Eco-engineering urban infrastructure for marine and coastal biodiversity: Which interventions have the greatest ecological benefit? (2018, background): “The net effect is urbanised 82 ecosystems that are fundamentally different in structure and function to the natural habitat 83 which they displace (Airoldi et al. 2015; Gittman et al. 2016; Heery et al. 2017).”
- Effects of ocean sprawl on ecological connectivity: impacts and solutions (2017, background): “…habitats by affecting light availability, fl ow, wave energy, sediment and resource transport, by leaching chemicals, modifying predator-prey interactions and/or by producing noise during their construction (reviewed by Dugan et al., 2011; Dafforn et al., 2015b; Heery et al., 2017-in this issue).”