From protection to production: productive impacts of the Malawi Social Cash Transfer scheme

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Livelihood Impacts of Cash Transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Beneficiary Perspectives from Six Countries (2017, background): “These results correspond to findings from quantitative impact evaluations, where some impact was seen on purchase of assets and inputs but not systematically within or across countries (Asfaw et al. 2014; Covarrubias et al., 2012; OPM, 2014c).”
Debunking the Stereotype of the Lazy Welfare Recipient (2015, unknown): “Two studies in African countries find similar patterns of reductions in wage labor, together with increases in self-employed activities (Covarrubias et al. 2012; American Institutes for Research 2013).”
Debunking the Stereotype of the Lazy Welfare Recipient: Evidence from Cash Transfer Programs Worldwide (2017, unknown): “8 Treatment status was randomized over 8 communities in Malawi’s SCT program (Covarrubias et al, 2012) and over 28 locations in Kenya’s CT-OVC.”