Debunking the Stereotype of the Lazy Welfare Recipient

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cash transfers and labor supply: Evidence from a large-scale program in Iran (2018, unknown): “There is also a smaller but expanding literature that examines the impact of cash transfers, conditional or unconditional, on labor supply (Bandiera et al. 2017; Banerjee et al. 2015; Bosch and Manacorda 2012; Mena and Hernani-Limarino 2015).”
General Equilibrium Effects of Cash Transfers: Experimental Evidence from Kenya (2019, result): “This is consistent with the studies reviewed by Banerjee et al. (2017), which generally find that cash transfers in low and middle income countries do not reduce labor supply.”
A Mixed-Method Review of Cash Transfers and Intimate Partner Violence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (2018, background): “…expenditure and consumption, household durable and productive assets, income-generation and labor-force participation, and savings and investments (Hidrobo et al. 2014; Bastagli et al. 2016; Natali et al. 2016; Banerjee et al. 2017; Handa et al. 2017; Handa et al. 2018; Hidrobo et al. 2018).”