The Young's modulus of a microcrystalline cellulose

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

State of the Art Manufacturing and Engineering of Nanocellulose: A Review of Available Data and Industrial Applications (2013, unknown): “3 - 8 Tensile, Raman [130-131]”
Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis (2006, methodology): “To eliminate preferential orientation, the specimens were rotated within the X-ray diffractometer as suggested by Eichhorn and Young (2001). Yield was calculated as % (of initial weight) of MCC after hydrolysis.”
Cellulose reinforced polymer composites and nanocomposites: a critical review (2013, methodology): “In a later study, Eichhorn and Young (2001) characterized the mechanical properties of single MCC particles using the band shift of Raman spectra, a method first reported by Hamad and Eichhorn (1997).”
A comparative molecular dynamics study of crystalline, paracrystalline and amorphous states of cellulose (2014, background): “In general, the amorphous to crystalline ratio is a function of the microfibril cross section (Cheng et al. 2009; Eichhorn and Young 2001; Tanpichai et al. 2012; Eichhorn et al. 2010) and can be related to the surface to volume ratio of a microfibril.”