Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis; from the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics

By A. Singleton. Learned Publishing, 2010

586 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Overview of the Health Informatics Research Field: A Bibliometric Approach (2010, methodology): “We use bibliometric methods [5-8], which are formal, quantifiable techniques for analysing research activities and output, such as publications and patents.”
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2015, background): “Such a historical account is offered by De Bellis (2009).”
Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2014, background): “Publication numbers and both publishing styles as well as citing styles have developed throughout history (de Bellis, 2009).”
Creativity in scientific teams: : Unpacking novelty and impact (2015, unknown): “For a paper, acceptance for publication indicates an acknowledgment of its original contributions to science from peers in the field, but being cited further indicates the peerrecognition of its value and its impact on the scientific community (De Bellis, 2009; Merton, 1973; Simonton, 2004).”
Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing? (2021, background): “The number of published papers is growing exponentially (Tabah, 1999; De Bellis, 2009; Bornmann and Mutz, 2015).”