A nonhydrostatic model based on a new approach
By Zavisa I. Janjic. 2002
390 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ba6c9a885a2fb1f1adb9d828c6d53647d96cd9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- William C. Skamarock
- Joseph B. Klemp
- Jimy Dudhia
- Wei Wang
- F. Bouttier
- P. Brousseau
- Michael Coniglio
- F. Kong
In Global and Planetary Change
- Jimy Dudhia
- Joseph B. Klemp
- Wei Wang
- William C. Skamarock
- Michael Coniglio
- F. Kong
- Ming Xue
- F. Bouttier
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Well balanced finite volume methods for nearly hydrostatic flows (2004, methodology): “and models based on the Euler equations of compressible fluid mechanics, which do not explicitly assume a hydrostatic balance, have been introduced for research and operational purposes [2,7,10,13,17,22,38,45].”
- The Weather Research and Forecast Model: software architecture and performance [presentation] (2005, methodology): “NOAA/NCEP’s operational implementation of WRF is using dynamics adapted to the WRF ASF from the Non-hydrostatic Mesoscale Model (NMM) [3][8][9][15].”
- Nonhydrostatic Atmospheric Models and Operational Development at JMA (2007, methodology): “In June 2006 the nonhydrostatic WRF-NMM (Weather Research and Forecasting Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model; Janjic 2003) replaced the hydrostatic Eta model as the NAM model.”
- A New Visibility Parameterization for Warm-Fog Applications in Numerical Weather Prediction Models (2006, methodology): “The detailed microphysics of the 1D Parameterized Fog (PAFOG) model (Bott and Trautmann 2002) was incorporated and fully coupled with the 3D Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model (NMM) of the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) (Janjic et al. 2001; Janjic 2003).”
- Probabilistic Forecast Guidance for Severe Thunderstorms Based on the Identification of Extreme Phenomena in Convection-Allowing Model Forecasts (2011, neutral): “The initial and lateral boundary conditions originated from the operational North American Me-soscale Model (NAM; Janjic´ 2003) run by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP).”
- The AROME-France Convective-Scale Operational Model (2011, methodology): “1998), the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF; Janjic 2003; Skamarock and Klemp 2008), or the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research (PSU–NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5; Grell et al.”
- Verification and Calibration of Neighborhood and Object-Based Probabilistic Precipitation Forecasts from a Multimodel Convection-Allowing Ensemble (2012, neutral): “The 2009 ensemble contained 20 members: 10 with ARW-WRF (Skamarock et al. 2005), 8 with WRF-NMM (Janjic 2003), and 2 with the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS; Xue et al. 2003).”
- Evaluating Mesoscale NWP Models Using Kinetic Energy Spectra (2004, methodology): “The value of 17 000 m2 s21 is the lower bound on the deformation-scaled second-order damping (2a) used in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model (NMM) model (Janjic 2003) at 8-km horizontal grid spacing.”
- Next-Day Convection-Allowing WRF Model Guidance: A Second Look at 2-km versus 4-km Grid Spacing (2009, methodology): “However, whereas the high-resolution models differed just in terms of horizontal grid spacing, there were many differences between the NAM and WRF-ARW configurations (Table 1). Most significantly, the NAM used CP, a different dynamical core (WRF-NMM; Janjic et al. 2001; Janjic 2003 ), integrated ov”