Comparative Analysis of Dielectric-Modulated FET and TFET-Based Biosensor

By Rakhi Narang, Manoj Saxena, Mridula Gupta. IEEE transactions on nanotechnology, 2015

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Bioengineering, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b7a32f41ce44d49cd9590670f15323c3612b0f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Brinda Bhowmick
2. Dharmendra Singh Yadav
3. Dheeraj Sharma
4. Rupam Goswami

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Brinda Bhowmick
2. Dharmendra Singh Yadav
3. Dheeraj Sharma
4. Rupam Goswami

Citations in the corpus

• N+ Pocket Doped Vertical TFET Based Dielectric-Modulated Biosensor Considering Non-Ideal Hybridization Issue: A Simulation Study (2020, background): “TFET based biosensors response faster due to band-to-band tunneling and lesser subthreshold swing (SS) [17]–[20].”
• A Charge-Plasma-Based Dielectric-Modulated Junctionless TFET for Biosensor Label-Free Detection (2017, unknown): “In addition to these, in an earlier reported work of FET and physically doped TFET [16], high doping concentration (in source/drain region) makes the fabrication process very complex, which results in a higher thermal budget and expensive thermal annealing technique.”
• Performance Assessment of A Novel Vertical Dielectrically Modulated TFET-Based Biosensor (2017, background): “sensitivity [8]–[11] and response time [5]–[7] than FET-based”
• Comparative Analyses of Circular Gate TFET and Heterojunction TFET for Dielectric-Modulated Label-Free Biosensing (2019, background): “cules are considered in accordance with the values reported for DNA [11], [20]–[22], [35] which is negatively charged.”