Conceptual and perceptual factors in the picture superiority effect

By Georg Stenberg. 2006

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b69665e272ca9ce41147c67afdbe285b29c4308

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News (2020, background): “Stenberg (2006) shows that individuals process visual information more directly and with less effort than verbal information.”
An Analysis of Research on Metacognitive Teaching Strategies (2014, result): “Along with the results of this analytical review, there are a number of other sources showing that visual modes of learning have a significant impact on achievement (McBride & Dosher, 2002; Read & Barnsley, 1977; Stenberg, 2006).”
The Impact of Internet Pornography on Adolescents: A Review of the Research (2012, background): “The essential notion of this phenomenon is that greater levels of cortical processing and encoding occur, which favor recognition and retention of pictures over other stimuli such as spoken words (Arieh & Algom, 2002; Stenberg, 2006).”
Does rehearsal matter? Left anterior temporal alpha and theta band changes correlate with the beneficial effects of rehearsal on working memory. (2021, unknown): “This ability is termed the picture superiority effect (Stenberg, 2006) and may also account for the fact that performance for images was near ceiling regardless of maintenance strategy.”
Does rehearsal benefit visual memory? The role of semantic associations in the maintenance of intact and phase-scrambled scenes (2019, unknown): “This ability has been termed the picture superiority effect (Stenberg, 2006) and may account for the fact that generating a semantic label and rehearsing provided no additional benefit.”