Four layouts and a finding: the effects of changes in the order of the verbal labels and numerical values on Likert‐type scales
By J. Hartley, Lucy R. Betts. 2010
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ab02e986bf083e37eabecb86ee27ac3c7aeb3c7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review (2021, methodology): “Following this approach, the items were categorized on a scale of five-points and given weights according to their importance (Cinquini & Tenucci, 2010; Dawes, 2002; Dawes, 2012; Hartley & Betts, 2010).”
- Some thoughts on Likert-type scales (2014, methodology): “Likert-type scales are used regularly, and much is known about their properties (for useful reviews, see Hartley & Betts, 2010; Krosnick & Fabrigar, 1997; Oppenheim, 2000).”
- Board Diversity and Corporate Social Disclosure: Evidence from Vietnam (2016, unknown): “A wide-scale increases the variance of responses obtained and makes the results more reliable (Dawes 2002; Hartley and Betts 2010).”