IMPROVED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM ∼100 NEW CfA SUPERNOVA TYPE Ia LIGHT CURVES
By M. Hicken, W. M. Wood-Vasey, S. Blondin, P. Challis, S. Jha, Patrick L. Kelly, Armin Rest, R. Kirshner. 2009
772 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We combine the CfA3 supernovae Type Ia (SN Ia) sample with samples from the literature to calculate improved constraints on the dark energy equation of state parameter, w. The CfA3 sample is added to the Union set of Kowalski et al. to form the Constitution set and, combined with a BAO prior, produces 1 + w = 0.013+0.066−0.068 (0.11 syst), consistent with the cosmological constant. The CfA3 addition makes the cosmologically useful sample of nearby SN Ia between 2.6 and 2.9 times larger than before, reducing the statistical uncertainty to the point where systematics play the largest role. We use four light-curve fitters to test for systematic differences: SALT, SALT2, MLCS2k2 (RV = 3.1), and MLCS2k2 (RV = 1.7). SALT produces high-redshift Hubble residuals with systematic trends versus color and larger scatter than MLCS2k2. MLCS2k2 overestimates the intrinsic luminosity of SN Ia with 0.7 < Δ < 1.2. MLCS2k2 with RV = 3.1 overestimates host-galaxy extinction while RV ≈ 1.7 does not. Our investigation is consistent with no Hubble bubble. We also find that, after light-curve correction, SN Ia in Scd/Sd/Irr hosts are intrinsically fainter than those in E/S0 hosts by 2σ, suggesting that they may come from different populations. We also find that SN Ia in Scd/Sd/Irr hosts have low scatter (0.1 mag) and reddening. Current systematic errors can be reduced by improving SN Ia photometric accuracy, by including the CfA3 sample to retrain light-curve fitters, by combining optical SN Ia photometry with near-infrared photometry to understand host-galaxy extinction, and by determining if different environments give rise to different intrinsic SN Ia luminosity after correction for light-curve shape and color.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9aa915215834fe3925db1d7fb04aae5cfb0d8585
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- L. Hernquist
- D. Schneider
- P. Hopkins
- Simon D. M. White
- Andrey V. Kravtsov
- Volker Springel
- A. Riess
- Daniel J. Eisenstein
Citations in the corpus
- THE ATACAMA COSMOLOGY TELESCOPE: SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH-SELECTED GALAXY CLUSTERS AT 148 GHz IN THE 2008 SURVEY (2010, background): “…clusters provides powerful constraints on cosmological parameters, complementary to those obtained from different measurements, such as the angular power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background (e.g., Komatsu et al. 2010) or luminosity distances of Type Ia supernovae (e.g., Hicken et al. 2009).”
- Measuring Dark Energy Properties with Photometrically Classified Pan-STARRS Supernovae. II. Cosmological Parameters (2017, methodology): “…Alam et al. 2015), the SuperNova Legacy Survey (SNLS; Astier et al. 2006) high-z SNe from HST (Riess et al. 2007) and low-z SNe (Hamuy et al. 1996; Riess et al. 1999; Jha et al. 2006; Hicken et al. 2009c,b; Contreras et al. 2010; Folatelli et al. 2010) to form the Joint Lightcurve Analysis (JLA).”
- TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA LIGHT CURVE INFERENCE: HIERARCHICAL MODELS IN THE OPTICAL AND NEAR-INFRARED (2010, methodology): “SN Ia distance indicators exploit empirical relations between peak optical luminosities of SNe Ia and distance-independent measures such as light curve shape observed in the sample of nearby low-z SNe Ia (Hamuy et al. 1996a; Riess et al. 1999; Jha et al. 2006; Hicken et al. 2009a).”
- First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters (2018, methodology): “We supplement the DES-SN sample with a low-redshift (z < 0.1) sample, which we call the low-z subset, comprising 122 SNe from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics surveys (CfA3, CfA4; Hicken et al. 2009b, 2012b) and the Carnegie Supernova Project (CSP; Contreras et al. 2010; Stritzinger e”
- THE CARNEGIE SUPERNOVA PROJECT: LIGHT-CURVE FITTING WITH SNooPy (2010, background): “This has led several authors to simply combine the two effects into one generalized color term and marginalize over it when solving for the cosmological parameters (Astier et al. 2006; Hicken et al. 2009).”
- DISSECTING THE GRAVITATIONAL LENS B1608+656. II. PRECISION MEASUREMENTS OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT, SPATIAL CURVATURE, AND THE DARK ENERGY EQUATION OF STATE (2009, result): “While the BAO and SN data sets are continually improving (e.g. Hicken et al. 2009), this particular well-defined snapshot is sufficient for us to explore the relative information content of our data set compared with other, well-known cosmological data sets.”
- CARNEGIE HUBBLE PROGRAM: A MID-INFRARED CALIBRATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT (2012, background): “Recent analyses of a sample of well-measured SNe Ia (Hicken et al. 2009) sampling volumes with velocities extending to over 20,000 km s−1 suggest that there are no significant systematic departures of the Hubble constant from its globally averaged value; i.e., there is no local void.”
- The delay-time distribution of Type Ia supernovae from Sloan II (2012, methodology): “A correlation has been known for some time (e.g. Hicken et al. 2009; Neill et al. 2009; Hamuy et al. 2000) between the age of a SN Ia host and the SN luminosity (or, equivalently, its light curve’s ‘stretch parameter’, s, or the mass of radioactive Ni synthesized).”
- COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM MEASUREMENTS OF TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE DISCOVERED DURING THE FIRST 1.5 yr OF THE Pan-STARRS1 SURVEY (2013, methodology): “We also use the SN Ia compiled more recently by CfA3 (Hicken et al. 2009a, 185 SNe), CSP (Contreras et al. 2010, 85 SNe), and CfA4 (Hicken et al. 2012, 94 SNe).”
- The Observed Growth of Massive Galaxy Clusters I: Statistical Methods and Cosmological Constraints (2009, background): “…et al. 2009; Vikhlinin et al. 2009b) and optically selected (Rozo et al. 2010) cluster samples, and a variety of independent cosmological data (Percival et al. 2007, 2010; A08; Fu et al. 2008; Ho et al. 2008; Kowalski et al. 2008; Hicken et al. 2009; Reid et al. 2010, see also references in M08).”
- Four new observational H(z) data from luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release seven (2012, background): “…(BAO) peaks (Eisenstein et al., 2005; Percival et al., 2010), measurements of ‘standard candles’ such as the redshift-distance relationship of type Ia supernovae (SNIa) (SNIa; Riess et al., 1998; Hicken et al., 2009) and gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) (GRBs; Ghirlanda et al., 2004; Li et al., 2008) .”
- TESTING THE DISTANCE–DUALITY RELATION WITH GALAXY CLUSTERS AND TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE (2010, methodology): “…is to propose a consistent cosmological- model-independent test for equation (1) by using two sub-samples of SNe Ia chosen from Constitution data (M. Hicken et al. 2009) and two angular diameter distance (ADD) samples from galaxy clusters obtained through Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect and X-ray…”
- Berkeley Supernova Ia Program – I. Observations, data reduction and spectroscopic sample of 582 low-redshift Type Ia supernovae (2012, methodology): “Many spectra presented in this paper have complementary light curves from Hamuy et al. (1996), Riess et al. (1999), Jha et al. (2006), Hicken et al. (2009), and Ganeshalingam et al. (2010), which have all been compiled and fit by Ganeshalingam et al. (in prep.).”
- A 2.4% DETERMINATION OF THE LOCAL VALUE OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT (2016, methodology): “As in R11, we make use of several studies (Hicken et al. 2009b; Kelly et al. 2010; Lampeitl et al. 2010; Sullivan et al. 2010) which have shown the existence of a small step brighter for the corrected SN magnitude for hosts more massive than ~Mlog 10stellar .”
- Time delay cosmography (2016, background): “When this figure was made, the available precision from just these two lenses was about the same as that from SDSS DR7 baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO Percival et al. 2010) or the “Constitution” set of Type Ia supernovae (Hicken et al. 2009).”