Reputation-based partner choice is an effective alternative to indirect reciprocity in solving social dilemmas

By Karolina Sylwester, Gilbert Roberts. 2013

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a918327ff4e8e9f967935a9f1738110b014ca13

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Pat Barclay
2. Eleanor A. Power
3. R. Bird
4. Stefan Pfattheicher
5. Johannes Keller

In Safety Research

1. Eleanor A. Power
2. Pat Barclay
3. R. Bird
4. E. Smith
5. Isabel Thielmann
6. Benjamin E. Hilbig
7. Johannes Keller
8. Stefan Pfattheicher

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Eleanor A. Power
2. Pat Barclay
3. R. Bird
4. E. Smith
5. Stefan Pfattheicher
6. Johannes Keller
7. Isabel Thielmann
8. Benjamin E. Hilbig

Citations in the corpus

• Prosocial signaling and cooperation among Martu hunters (2015, background): “…theory of cooperation has primarily come from experimental games, where subjects often choose to cooperate more often with those who have established themselves as more generous (Barclay & Willer, 2007; Klapwijk & Van Lange, 2009; Sylwester & Roberts, 2013; Wedekind & Milinski, 2000;Willer, 2009).”
• Biological markets and the effects of partner choice on cooperation and friendship (2016, background): “com be more effective than indirect reciprocity in maintaining contributions to public goods [39 ,40].”