Institutional choice, community, and struggle: a case study of forest co-management in Mexico.

By D. Klooster. 2000

285 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Safety Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a89355ce75027337b0270d7f32a362ebd1f5b20

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Safety Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

New Rights for Forest-Based Communities? Understanding Processes of Forest Tenure Reform (2010, background): “These have included case studies of social or community forestry (Bray et al. 2005, Colfer 2005a,b, Gibson et al. 2000, Klooster 1999, 2000, Menzies 2007, Oyono 2004, 2005, Peluso 1992, Poffenberger 1990, 1996), decentralization and devolution (Agrawal 2005, Agrawal and Ostrom 2008, Andersson 2006,…”
The Impact of Resource Scarcity on Bonding and Bridging Social Capital: the Case of Fishers’ Information-Sharing Networks in Loreto, BCS, Mexico (2009, background): “Klooster (2000) has shown that conflict and corruption are important factors in explaining changes in social systems involved in common-pool resources.”
Neoliberalism and the Environment in Latin America (2006, methodology): “He uses fieldwork, primarily in the states of Oaxaca and Michoacan, to empirically test theories about the tragedy of the commons, institutions for common property management, forest transition theory, and neoliberal reforms (88, 89).”
Rights to Land, Forests and Carbon in REDD+: Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica (2011, background): “Unfortunately, however, the illegal logging networks and corruption characterizing the concessionaires and forest bans‘ period still exist in many locations [57].”
A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management (2010, background): “…argue for a more constructionist or historically, socially, and environmentally embedded perspective that departs from viewing actors as rational decision makers, and communities of users as coherent wholes without internal conflict or heterogeneity (Mosse 1997, Leach et al. 1999, Klooster 2000).”
Participatory Development in the Presence of Endogenous Community Imperfections (2002, background): “For an interesting illustration of the role of facilitators, see the experience of the Gal Oya project in Sri Lanka [Ostrom, 1990: 166–72; Uphoff, 1999], or that of the UZACHI forestry communities in Mexico [Klooster, 2000].”
Participatory Forest Management: A Route to Poverty Reduction? (2009, unknown): “Only communities with high value timber in their forests, like some of the ARPIP cases in Nepal’s Churia region and one Tanzanian CBFM village, as well as reports from communities in Mexico (Klooster 2000), Guatemala (Nittler and Tschinkel 2005) and Cameroon (Oyono et al.”
The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services (2007, background): “…also manage the costs and benefits that emergent types of resource use can imply for members of the group (Bromley and Cernea, 1989; Ostrom and Schlager, 1996) and they are key in ensuring that resource management outcomes are perceived as collectively fair and advantageous (Klooster, 2000).”