A colorectal cancer classification system that associates cellular phenotype and responses to therapy

By A. Sadanandam, C. Lyssiotis, K. Homicsko, E. Collisson, W. J. Gibb, S. Wullschleger, Liliane C Gonzalez Ostos, William A. Lannon, Carsten Grotzinger, M. Del Rio and 6 more. Nature Medicine, 2013

957 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer mortality. Whereas some patients respond well to therapy, others do not, and thus more precise, individualized treatment strategies are needed. To that end, we analyzed gene expression profiles from 1,290 CRC tumors using consensus-based unsupervised clustering. The resultant clusters were then associated with therapeutic response data to the epidermal growth factor receptor–targeted drug cetuximab in 80 patients. The results of these studies define six clinically relevant CRC subtypes. Each subtype shares similarities to distinct cell types within the normal colon crypt and shows differing degrees of 'stemness' and Wnt signaling. Subtype-specific gene signatures are proposed to identify these subtypes. Three subtypes have markedly better disease-free survival (DFS) after surgical resection, suggesting these patients might be spared from the adverse effects of chemotherapy when they have localized disease. One of these three subtypes, identified by filamin A expression, does not respond to cetuximab but may respond to cMET receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the metastatic setting. Two other subtypes, with poor and intermediate DFS, associate with improved response to the chemotherapy regimen FOLFIRI in adjuvant or metastatic settings. Development of clinically deployable assays for these subtypes and of subtype-specific therapies may contribute to more effective management of this challenging disease.

Subfields: Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a6b71939a602201df39769e169a6c0d67f3226f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Oncology

  1. Hans Clevers
  2. Jérôme Galon
  3. E. Batlle
  4. Alexander van Oudenaarden
  5. Michael R. Stratton
  6. Tero Aittokallio
  7. Gad Getz
  8. Louis Vermeulen

In Pathology and Forensic Medicine

  1. Hans Clevers

Citations in the corpus