On the need for a nonlinear subscale turbulence term in POD models as exemplified for a high-Reynolds-number flow over an Ahmed body

By J. Osth, Bernd R. Noack, Sinivsa Krajnovi'c, D. Barros, Jacques Bor'ee. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract We investigate a hierarchy of eddy-viscosity terms in proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) Galerkin models to account for a large fraction of unresolved fluctuation energy. These Galerkin methods are applied to large eddy simulation (LES) data for a flow around a vehicle-like bluff body called an Ahmed body. This flow has three challenges for any reduced-order model: a high Reynolds number, coherent structures with broadband frequency dynamics, and meta-stable asymmetric base flow states. The Galerkin models are found to be most accurate with modal eddy viscosities as proposed by Rempfer & Fasel (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 260, 1994a, pp. 351–375; J. Fluid Mech. vol. 275, 1994b, pp. 257–283). Robustness of the model solution with respect to initial conditions, eddy-viscosity values and model order is achieved only for state-dependent eddy viscosities as proposed by Noack, Morzyński & Tadmor (Reduced-Order Modelling for Flow Control, CISM Courses and Lectures, vol. 528, 2011). Only the POD system with state-dependent modal eddy viscosities can address all challenges of the flow characteristics. All parameters are analytically derived from the Navier–Stokes-based balance equations with the available data. We arrive at simple general guidelines for robust and accurate POD models which can be expected to hold for a large class of turbulent flows.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a66e91d64a3a89692ea892d91beb496bb3037bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Steven L. Brunton
  2. J. Nathan Kutz
  3. Eurika Kaiser
  4. Bingni W. Brunton
  5. Krithika Manohar
  6. Bernd R. Noack
  7. Thomas Duriez
  8. Jacques Bor'ee

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Steven L. Brunton
  2. J. Nathan Kutz
  3. Bingni W. Brunton
  4. Eurika Kaiser
  5. Krithika Manohar
  6. Joshua L. Proctor
  7. Bernd R. Noack
  8. Maizar Raissi

Citations in the corpus