On closures for reduced order models—A spectrum of first-principle to machine-learned avenues

By Shady E. Ahmed, Suraj Pawar, Omer San, Adil Rasheed, Traian Iliescu, Bernd R. Noack. The Physics of Fluids, 2021

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

For over a century, reduced order models (ROMs) have been a fundamental discipline of theoretical fluid mechanics. Early examples include Galerkin models inspired by the Orr-Sommerfeld stability equation and numerous vortex models, of which the von K\'arm\'an vortex street is one of the most prominent. Subsequent ROMs typically relied on first principles, like mathematical Galerkin models, weakly nonlinear stability theory, and two- and three-dimensional vortex models. Aubry et al. [N. Aubry, P. Holmes, J. Lumley, and E. Stone, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 192, 115-173 (1988)] pioneered data-driven proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) modeling. In early POD modeling, available data was used to build an optimal basis, which was then utilized in a classical Galerkin procedure to construct the ROM. But data has made a profound impact on ROMs beyond the Galerkin expansion. In this paper, we take a modest step and illustrate the impact of data-driven modeling on one significant ROM area. Specifically, we focus on ROM closures, which are correction terms that are added to classical ROMs in order to model the effect of the discarded ROM modes in under-resolved simulations. Through simple examples, we illustrate the main modeling principles used to construct classical ROMs, motivate and introduce modern ROM closures, and show how data-driven modeling, artificial intelligence, and machine learning have changed the standard ROM methodology over the last two decades. Finally, we outline our vision on how state-of-the-art data-driven modeling can continue to reshape the field of reduced order modeling.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Materials Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16861131abd1326b4698bb8949bad6e452dc8190

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Ricardo Vinuesa
  2. Steven L. Brunton
  3. J. Nathan Kutz
  4. Joshua L. Proctor
  5. Igor Mezi'c
  6. Bingni W. Brunton
  7. Eurika Kaiser
  8. Joseph Sang-Il Kwon

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Ricardo Vinuesa
  2. Steven L. Brunton

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Ricardo Vinuesa
  2. Steven L. Brunton
  3. J. Nathan Kutz
  4. Maizar Raissi
  5. Joshua L. Proctor
  6. Bingni W. Brunton
  7. Eurika Kaiser
  8. G. Em Karniadakis

Citations in the corpus