Political Sophistication and Policy Reasoning: A Reconsideration

By Paul N. Goren. 2004

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a5b9b8e01b3aa9d44ef40049434013944b86781

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Rune Stubager
2. Nathan P. Kalmoe
3. John T. Jost
4. M. Petersen
5. Christopher M. Federico
6. Matthew Levendusky
7. Rune Slothuus
8. Lise Togeby

In Political Science and International Relations

1. M. Petersen
2. Rune Stubager
3. Nathan P. Kalmoe
4. C. Funk
5. J. Alford
6. John T. Jost
7. John R. Hibbing
8. Christopher M. Federico

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John T. Jost
2. Jaime L. Napier
3. Nathan P. Kalmoe
4. Christopher M. Federico
5. M. Petersen
6. John R. Hibbing
7. Matthew V. Hibbing
8. J. Alford

Citations in the corpus

• Rethinking the Role of Political Information (2011, background): “Previous estimates of information are therefore likely to be overstatements of the effects of information on behavior (see also Ansolabehere, Rodden, and Snyder 2008; Gabel and Scheve 2007; Goren 2004; Sekhon 2005).”
• Genetic and Environmental Transmission of Political Orientations (2013, background): “Public opinion scholars have put forward diverse schemes of “core values” suspected of structuring issue attitudes (see, e.g., Feldman, 1988; Feldman & Johnston, 2009; Goren, 2004; Hurwitz & Peffley, 1987; Jacoby, 2006; Kinder, 2008; McCloskey & Zaller, 1984; Zaller, 1992).”
• Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity (2014, unknown): “…may possess more attitude structure than previously supposed (Achen, 1975; Ansolabehere, Rodden, & Snyder, 2008; Feldman, 1988; Goren, 2001, 2004; Peffley & Hurwitz, 1985), scholars have returned to the task of elucidating the antecedents of attachments to liberal or conservative ideas,…”
• Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic (2011, methodology): “In line with much prior research (e.g., Basinger & Lavine 2005; Zaller 1992; but see Goren 2004), we find a positive and significant two-way interaction.”
• Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. (2009, background): “…may be considered ideological in the sense of being broad postures that explain and justify different states of social and political affairs (e.g., Feldman 1988; Feldman & Steenbergen 2001; Goren 2004; Jost et al. 2003b,c; Lavine et al. 1997; McCann 2008; Peffley & Hurwitz 1985; Rathbun 2007).”
• Uses and Abuses of Ideology in Political Psychology (2020, background): “…mass ideological limits and tries to sidestep ideology per se with values performing similar heuristic and organizational feats within narrower domains, rather than one superstructure across all areas (e.g., Feldman, 1988, 2003; Goren, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2012; Markus, 2001; Schwartz et al., 2010).”