Validity and fairness

By Michael Kane. 2010

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99e79a1ccdc6cd460c78becff2b2a01caf522eaa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Mark J. Chin
2. H. Hill
3. Michael T. Kalkbrenner

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Mark J. Chin
2. H. Hill
3. Michael T. Kalkbrenner

Citations in the corpus

• Alpha, Omega, and H Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: Reviewing These Options and When to Use Them (2021, background): “Counselors should also consider a number of additional important aspects of test-worthiness, including validity evidence (see Kalkbrenner, 2021), cross-cultural fairness (Kane, 2010), and practicality (Neukrug & Fawcett, 2015).”
• Connections Between Teachers’ Knowledge of Students, Instruction, and Achievement Outcomes (2018, background): “One major reason is that, as Kane (2010) emphasizes, one validates scores, and validates them for a particular use.”