Interactive Order-Independent Transparency

By Cass W. Everitt. 2001

534 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99b8940b5a6dab8527198e966c0eb7e2a02ee28c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Joe Michael Kniss
2. Stephan R. Richter
3. Eike Falk Anderson
4. Fotis Liarokapis
5. Leigh McLoughlin
6. Stefan Roth
7. Christopher E. Peters
8. Panagiotis Petridis

Citations in the corpus

• Matryoshka Networks: Predicting 3D Geometry via Nested Shape Layers (2018, methodology): “Our work, in contrast, is inspired by depth peeling [7] and”
• MorphoGraphX: A platform for quantifying morphogenesis in 4D (2015, methodology): “The rendering uses a modified front-to-back depth peeling technique (Everitt, 2001) interweaving the volumetric rendering between peels of translucent surfaces.”
• Real-time volume graphics (2006, background): “The depth structure can be determined by an algorithm reminiscent of the depth-peeling algorithm [22]: The depth structure is constructed by peeling off the geometry in a depth-layer by depth-layer fashion.”
• Developing serious games for cultural heritage: a state-of-the-art review (2010, methodology): “A number of order-independent transparency techniques have been developed, however, such as depth-peeling (Everitt 2001; Nagy and Klein 2003).”