Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations

790 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Error estimation of closed‐form solution for annual rate of structural collapse (2008, methodology): “As an alternative to developing collapse fragility curves via IDA data, various data is available for collapse capacities for generic moment resisting frames and shear walls, which are useful for preliminary design assessments [22].”
Vector-valued Intensity Measures Incorporating Spectral Shape For Prediction of Structural Response (2008, methodology): “Another set of structures were considered that are identical to the models of Medina and Krawinkler except that they incorporate elements that degrade in stiffness and strength [Ibarra 2003, Ibarra et al. 2005].”
A vector‐valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon (2005, methodology): “A set of degrading models designed and analyzed by Ibarra [34] was also considered.”
Strong ground motion record selection for the reliable prediction of the mean seismic collapse capacity of a structure group (2011, background): “P − effects and cyclic deterioration were neglected for the purpose of simplicity, although these non-linear effects could have an influence on the seismic collapse capacity [23].”