Vector-valued Intensity Measures Incorporating Spectral Shape For Prediction of Structural Response

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Spectral shape proxies and nonlinear structural response (2011, unknown): “The optimal values of T2 and TN, for RT1,T2 and Np, respectively, are analyzed as in [26].”
Implications of Intensity Measure Selection for Seismic Loss Assessment of 3-D Buildings (2016, background): “D) structural models under multi-directional excitations (Lucchini et al. 2011, Faggella et al. 2013), for tall buildings (Shome and Cornell 1999) or for buildings located at sites close to active faults where near-source type ground motions can be expected (Luco 2002, Baker and Cornell 2008).”
Optimal vector-valued intensity measure for seismic collapse assessment of structures (2015, background): “…the occurrence of collapse (C equals 1 if the record causes collapse and 0 otherwise), the following functional form is fi tted (Baker, 2005; Baker and Cornell, 2008b): 2 2 im C 1 1 2 2 im e( IM im , IM im ) 1 e a b a bP P C (8) where a and b are coeffi cients to be estimated from the…”
Strong ground motion record selection for the reliable prediction of the mean seismic collapse capacity of a structure group (2011, background): “It has been demonstrated that spectral shape can be indicated by epsilon, which is defined as a measure of the difference between the spectral acceleration of a record and the mean obtained from a ground motion prediction equation at a given period [12].”