Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography

By S. Iammarino, Philip McCann. 2010

379 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99a4e44ee98fe3f7f3e918ed41821b1225930070

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Regional economic development and tourism: A literature review to highlight future directions for regional tourism research (2019, background): “This diffusion of EEG into tourism studies is noteworthy since the first ever conceptual paper on EEG appeared in 2006 (Boschma and Frenken, 2006), and the Handbook of EEG was published as recently as 2010 (Boschma and Martin, 2010).”
Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements (2019, background): “The established empirical literature on the geography of entrepreneurship and economic development has revealed several factors to be of relevance in explaining the spatial heterogeneity in entrepreneurship (see Fritsch 2013; Sternberg 2009; Stam 2010; Stam and Spigel 2018).”
Understanding place-based entrepreneurship in rural Central Europe: A comparative institutional analysis (2014, background): “…variations increase the importance of regional and local contexts for entrepreneurship (Bosma and Schutjens, 2011; Marquis and Lounsbury, 2007; Stam, 2010), while they also seem to be the outcome of sociocultural contexts rather than solely of economic contexts (Davidsson et al., 2006;…”
Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory (2015, background): “…forms a part of endogenous modes of economic development consisting of activities, investment and systems arising and nurtured within a region, as opposed to being attracted from elsewhere (Audretsch 1995; Audretsch and Keilbach 2004a, 2008; Audretsch and Lehmann 2005; Stam 2010; Ghio et al. 2014).”
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique (2015, result): “…emphasis on the role of local conditions and bottom-up processes is largely in line with recent academic work on regional innovation and growth (cf. Boschma & Martin, 2010; Cooke et al., 2011), while the focus on ambitious entrepreneurship and institutions is also a key feature of recent academic…”
TOURISM EVOLUTION: ON THE SYNERGIES OF TOURISM STUDIES AND EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY (2013, background): “EEG focuses on how past conditions both enable and constrain future courses of economic change (Boschma & Martin, 2010a) and this paper shows how it may be a fruitful ground for future empirical and conceptual development.”
Path Renewal in Old Industrial Regions: Possibilities and Limitations for Regional Innovation Policy (2015, background): “More recently this debate has gained further momentum through the evolutionary turn in economic geography (BOSCHMA and FRENKEN, 2006; BOSCHMA and MARTIN, 2010; ESSLETZBICHLER and RIGBY, 2007; MARTIN and SUNLEY, 2007).”
Advancing Evolutionary Economic Geography by Engaged Pluralism (2014, background): “Since 2006 economic geographers have been confronted with the attempt to constitute such a new paradigm within their field of study, namely evolutionary economic geography (EEG) (BOSCHMA and FRENKEN, 2006, 2011; BOSCHMA and MARTIN, 2007, 2010; FRENKEN, 2007).”
Transformation of regional innovation systems : from old legacies to new development paths (2012, methodology): “Recent insights provided by scholars working in the field of EEG form a valuable basis for thinking about the transformative capacity of RISs (see e.g. Boschma and Martin 2010).”
The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography (2011, background): “…(Wenting 2008), the U.S. tire industry (Buenstorf and Klepper, 2009), the U.S. semiconductor industry (Klepper, 2010), the Dutch banking industry (Boschma and Wenting, 2010), the Dutch publishing industry (Heebels and Boschma, 2010) and the global video game industry (De Vaan et al., 2010).”
Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications (2019, unknown): “Agglomeration is also considered to lead to greater innovation (Cooke and Morgan, 1994; Iammarino, 2005) and to lower barriers and costs of knowledge sharing and transmission across individual and firm networks (Storper and Venables, 2004; Iammarino and McCann, 2010).”