The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework
288 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/995dc30a8b94395f6450c2e57b36edcc9d1d40de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing Risk for Sexual Recidivism: Some Proposals on the Nature of Psychologically Meaningful Risk Factors (2010, background): “Beech and Ward’s state/trait conception differs significantly from the stable/acute distinction because states and traits are both aspects of the same underlying construct—for any state, there should be a corresponding trait. In contrast, the concept of “acute” risk factors can subsume factors that ”
- The Risk Need Responsivity Model of Offender Rehabilitation: Is There Really a Need for a Paradigm Shift?. (2013, methodology): “Ironically, the general outline of this model is based on an earlier version of some of the work that Ward and Beech had published (Beech & Ward, 2004).”
- The Relationship of Statistical and Psychological Risk Markers to Sexual Reconviction in Child Molesters (2007, methodology): “Beech and Ward (2004) recently postulated a model that attempts to redefine dynamic factors and to bridge the gap between empirical risk literature and current theorizing.”
- The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. (2005, background): “…but those interested in understanding (and changing) recidivism risk are interested in dynamic (changeable) risk factors, also called “criminogenic needs” (Andrews & Bonta, 2003), “stable dynamic risk factors” (Hanson & Harris, 2000b) or “causal psychological risk factors” (Beech & Ward, 2004).”
- A Developmental Taxonomy of Juvenile Sex Offenders for Theory, Research, and Prevention (2012, background): “…(such as self-regulation deficits, sexual regulation, cognitive distortions supportive of sex offending, insecure attachment, etc.; e.g., Beech & Ward, 2004), but these traits do not explain why, and under which circumstances, individuals characterized by such predisposing factors may…”
- The role of cognitive distortions in paedophilic offending: Internet and contact offenders compared (2007, result): “Other researchers have also found similar schema in contact offenders (e.g. Beech & Ward, 2004).”