The Rise of Uber and Regulating the Disruptive Innovator
By G. Dudley, David Banister, Tim Schwanen. 2017
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9912553f3d67a1cb1757a575a7b386e08f03de3b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
In Marketing
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Creative destruction of the sharing economy in action: The case of Uber (2018, background): “As such, Uber has generated a great political controversy and government’s role as a regulator rose as a key challenge on how embrace the benefits of the disruptive innovator while considering the full range of the disruptor’s impacts (Dudley et al. 2017).”
- Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review (2019, result): “The most influential and representative work is by Farber (2005, 2015 ), who also uses hours worked as the measure of labor supply and all drivers’ average hourly income as an instrumental variable to individual driver’s income rate. From NYC taxi driver data, Farber finds that drivers are rational ”
- “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector (2019, background): “Policy discussions have primarily mirrored these concerns (e.g. Education and Employment References Committee, 2017), yet have also extended to mediating the disruptive impact of new entrants into existing markets (Dudley et al., 2017).”