What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research

By K. Meyer, A. van Witteloostuijn, Sjoerd Beugelsdijk. Journal of International Business Studies, 2017

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98fda647f24a8b6913e34e6d1d0173063142950b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Markku V. J. Maula
2. W. Stam

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Markku V. J. Maula
2. W. Stam

In Statistics and Probability

1. Markku V. J. Maula
2. W. Stam

Citations in the corpus

• Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research (2019, background): “To remove incentives for placing too much emphasis on p values, or even tweaking analyses to obtain a specific required significance level—a major concern known as p- hacking— many journals also in our fields have already started banning asterisks (e.g., Bettis et al., 2016; Meyer et al., 2017).”