Magnetic particle hyperthermia—biophysical limitations of a visionary tumour therapy

By R. Hergt, S. Dutz. 2007

853 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98f9f3bd90c84da2ec325a1e0ba99eea373f823f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomaterials

1. Jon Dobson
2. J. Cheon
3. Sumit Arora
4. Wahajuddin

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Jon Dobson
2. J. Cheon
3. S. Jones
4. Nguyen T. K. Thanh
5. Quentin Pankhurst
6. Sumit Arora
7. Wahajuddin

Citations in the corpus

• Progress in applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine (2009, background): “Hergt and Dutz have followed this argument through and concluded that the specific loss power (SLP)6 of the magnetic nanoparticles must be unrealistically high, certainly several orders of magnitude greater than the best currently reported, to heat a 3 mm cluster of cells, even with concentrations o”
• Magnetic Nanoparticles: Surface Effects and Properties Related to Biomedicine Applications (2013, background): “the particles to dissipate heat by conduction into the immediately surrounding tissue by mechanisms discussed above [130,134–137].”
• Exchange-coupled magnetic nanoparticles for efficient heat induction. (2011, background): “However, for most of these exciting new imaging and therapeutic applications of thermal actuation, the relatively poor energy transfer efficiency of the nanoparticle mediators presents a challenging obstacle, which either hinders full functionality or leads to a requirement for relatively large amou”