Government-initiated community resource management and local resource extraction from Nepal's forests

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries? (2010, background): “2009), and decentralized management on forest cover in Nepal (Edmonds 2002) and India (Somanathan, Prabhakar, and Mehta 2009), and forest incomes in Malawi (Jumbe and Angelsen 2006).”
Corruption, investments and contributions to public goods: Experimental evidence from rural Liberia (2014, methodology): “similar approach was used, for example, by Edmonds (2002) and Voors et al.”
Unbelievable but improved cookstoves are not helpful in reducing firewood demand in Nepal (2010, background): “Since the open-fire stove requires more firewood, researchers consider it as the most inefficient of all stove types (see Edmonds, 2002).”
Fuelwood, forests and community management – evidence from household studies (2008, background): “Edmonds (2002), Nepal Local forest management groups significantly reduce household collection of fuelwood from the managed forests in the first years following the establishment of the protection.”
Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: what works and what doesn't? (2012, background): “Micro studies of forest decentralization policies provide the few exceptions: fuelwood collected (Heltberg, 2001; Edmonds, 2002); percentage canopy cover per pixel (Somanathan et al.”