The Hardness of Metals
By D. Tabor. 2000
3,704 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98f26441398efb3b50c1dc517a23ccd08d9c690c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Hardness trends in micron scale indentation (2003, methodology): “Crude approximations can be obtained by extending the simple connection discussed in Section 4.3, H ∼ = 3( r ), between hardness and the uniaxial stress–strain curve proposed by Tabor (1951) to account for strain gradient eeects.”
- Finite element modeling of erosive wear (2005, methodology): “The only published analytical expression for the contact time is given by Tabor [25] dt Z p 2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi m 2ppr r (18) where m is the impacting-particle mass, p is the elastic load limit and r is the impacting particle radius.”
- Indentation across size scales and disciplines: Recent developments in experimentation and modeling (2007, background): “Early researchers proposed that the hardness H = P/A has the following relationship [7] H ¼ 3r 0:08 ; ð1Þ where r 0.08 is the compressive flow stress of the tested metal , at a representative strain of approximately 8%.”
- Effect of Mg addition on the creep and yield behavior of an Al–Sc alloy (2003, background): “The precipitate/matrix interface thus remains coherent for precipitate radii up to r 15 nm.”
- Plastic deformation in nanoindentation of tantalum: A new mechanism for prismatic loop formation (2014, background): “Nevertheless, the simple Tabor [5] relationship between yield stress and hardness (ry = H/3) is often used, in spite of its limitations. eserved.”
- Elastic recovery of a scratch in a polymeric surface: experiments and analysis (2001, methodology): “The validity of the definition given by Tabor [13] for the mean strain during contact was assessed in experiments performed with a spherical tip of constant radius.”
- Indentation Hardness Measurements at Macro-, Micro-, and Nanoscale: A Critical Overview (2017, background): “William Wade in 1856 [2], where a specified load was applied to a pyramid-shaped hardened tool, and the hardness value was evaluated from the size of the deformed cavity on the surface.”
- Radiation damage in helium ion irradiated nanocrystalline Fe (2012, methodology): “7r [55], where r is flow stress, and r = 3s⁄ using a Taylor factor of 3 [56], then kHP can be calculated by dividing the slope in Fig.”