Indentation across size scales and disciplines: Recent developments in experimentation and modeling

By A. Gouldstone, N. Chollacoop, Ming Dao, Ju Li, A. Minor, Yu‐Lin Shen. 2007

464 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aba6b922eb128fd5fbcd38cb461e0c75eaf79867

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Ju Li
2. Ting Zhu

In Materials Chemistry

1. Ting Zhu
2. Ju Li
3. S. Walley
4. Sneha N. Naik
5. Evan Ma
6. David L. McDowell

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Ju Li
2. Ting Zhu
3. S. Walley
4. Sneha N. Naik
5. David L. McDowell

Citations in the corpus

• Ultra-strength materials (2010, methodology): “used to numerically represent the ‘‘smaller is stronger” trend for a variety of measured strengths in materials, be d the mechanical probe size [124], the exterior sample size [142,77] or thin film thickness [136], or an interior size scale like the grain size [130–132], twin lamella thickness [133–”
• The Hall–Petch and inverse Hall–Petch relations and the hardness of nanocrystalline metals (2019, background): “The indentation process has been found to depend strongly on indenter geometry, depth of indentation, and specimen size [1].”