GMM WITH WEAK IDENTIFICATION
By James H. Stock, Jonathan H. Wright. 2000
824 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98bf709023b0f253f33c305b2d42c5f127b717e0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Christian Hansen
- James H. Stock
- Whitney K. Newey
- Jushan Bai
- Sophocles Mavroeidis
- Victor Chernozhukov
- M. Pesaran
- Patrik Guggenberger
In Finance
- James H. Stock
- Sophocles Mavroeidis
- Christian Hansen
- Victor Chernozhukov
- Mark W. Watson
- Patrik Guggenberger
- Eric Zivot
- M. Pesaran
Citations in the corpus
- ON THE ASYMPTOTIC SIZE DISTORTION OF TESTS WHEN INSTRUMENTS LOCALLY VIOLATE THE EXOGENEITY ASSUMPTION (2011, neutral): “Stock and Wright (2000) provide robust tests in a GMM context.”
- Luxury Goods and the Equity Premium (2004, neutral): “This is a problem in estimating the EIS since both consumption growth and asset returns are difficult to predict (Stock and Wright (2000), Neely, Roy, and Whiteman (2001), and Yogo (2003)).”
- Efficient GMM with nearly-weak instruments (2009, positive): “007y (for set 2): in other words, we confirm Stock and Wright's (2000) intuition that the parameter η\ which is estimated at the standard rate \ff is almost equal to <5.”
- Invited Paper - Even the Rich Can Make Themselves Poor: A Critical Examination of IV Methods in Marketing Applications (2014, background): “Villas-Boas and Winer (1999) make the point that even individual level choice models could be subject to price endogeneity.”
- GMM with Many Moment Conditions (2004, methodology): “Interestingly, for the last claim (i.e., asymptotic normality) to hold, the moment conditions should be stronger than in the Stock and Wright (2000) setting (c n = q n /n) since if c n = q n /n and q n → ∞, then q n /(nc n ) 1/2 = q 1/2 n → ∞.”
- Inference in Structural Vector Autoregressions identified with an external instrument (2020, methodology): “12 The parameter (aΘ0,11)(2)/Var(elξ ) is analogous to the so-called concentration parameter in IV regression (see for example Stock and Yogo (2005) and Andrews and Stock (2007)).”
- Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/GMM estimation and testing (2007, methodology): “This is the Stock and Wright (2000) S statistic, which is a Lagrange Multiplier (LM) version of the Anderson–Rubin weak-instruments-robust test.”
- Generalizing weak instrument robust IV statistics towards multiple parameters, unrestricted covariance matrices and identification statistics (2007, background): “A number of novel statistics have been proposed that overcome the difficulties associated with the traditional IV statistics: Stock and Wright (2000) introduce the S-statistic, which is based on the Anderson–Rubin (AR) (1949) statistic, Kleibergen (2002, 2005) constructs a score or Lagrange multip”
- Incentives, Targeting and Firm Performance: An Analysis of Non-Executive Stock Options (2010, neutral): “instruments such as the Stock-Wright S statistic (Stock and Wright (2000)), which generalizes the”
- GMM with many weak moment conditions (2005, methodology): “The alternative asymptotics is based on many weak moment sequences like those of Chao and Swanson (2004, 2005), Stock and Yogo (2004), and Han and Phillips (2005).”