AN EMPIRICAL MODEL OF SPECIES COEXISTENCE IN A SPATIALLY STRUCTURED ENVIRONMENT

By Douglas W. Yu, H. B. Wilson, N. Pierce. 2001

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Bottom‐up control and co‐occurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic (2004, background): “The distribution of sub-dominant ants may be controlled by the dominant species as suggested by the ant mosaic hypothesis, but the same pattern may also be caused by colonization events (Yu et al. 2001), or by a heterogeneous environment when co-”
Landscapes, space and equilibrium: shifting viewpoints (2002, background): “Yu et al. (2001), for example, test the idea that species coexistence in a homogenous habitat may be promoted by spatial structure by testing spatial models of coexistence with empirical data.”
Trade‐offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence (2004, background): “Most studies do not find the competitive/dispersal ability trade-off, but instead find species’ differences in habitat use (Marino 1991a,b; Harrison et al. 1995; Turnbull et al. 1999; Amarasekare 2000; Marshall et al. 2000; Yu et al. 2001).”
Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. (2003, background): “What coevolutionary dynamics characterize spatially structured populations of interacting ants and plants (Yu et al. 2001)?”