Review of Three-Phase PWM AC–AC Converter Topologies

By J. W. Kolar, Thomas Friedli, José Raúl Rodríguez Rodríguez, P. Wheeler. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982. Print), 2011

562 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

High-Level Penetration of Renewable Energy Sources Into Grid Utility: Challenges and Solutions (2020, background): “, 127]. On the other hand, one of the most attractive solutions is to employ the shunt active power lter 18 (SAPF) in order to improve power quality, reactive power and current harmonics compensation [128, 129]. With the increase of the penetration of renewable energy, the active power lter size inc”
Comparative Evaluation of Advanced Three-Phase Three-Level Inverter/Converter Topologies Against Two-Level Systems (2013, background): “, more complex three-level converter approaches such as the splitinductor converter [11], active clamped three-level topologies [12], or three-level matrix converters [13], the considered topologies are the most competitive for low-voltage applications.”
Comparative Evaluation of Three-Phase AC–AC Matrix Converter and Voltage DC-Link Back-to-Back Converter Systems (2012, methodology): “The formation of real input power P1 and reactive input power Q1 can be quantified by the subsequent equations, for standard modulation schemes of MCs, whereby the converter losses are neglected P1 = 3 √ 3 4 M12Û1Î2 cos (Φ∗1) cos(Φ2) (1) Q1 = 3 √ 3 4 M12Û1Î2 cos (Φ∗1) sin(Φ2) (2) M12 = 2√ 3 Û2 ”