Comparative Evaluation of Advanced Three-Phase Three-Level Inverter/Converter Topologies Against Two-Level Systems
By Mario Schweizer, Thomas Friedli, J. W. Kolar. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982. Print), 2013
404 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cf6ce1f92de73acec90c3f6def26d1f1c72ff77
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Frede Blaabjerg
- Brendan McGrath
- Lea Dorn-Gomba
- Michael A. E. Andersen
- Ali Emadi
- John Reimers
- Wuhua Li
- Yam Prasad Siwakoti
Citations in the corpus
- Transformerless Inverter Topologies for Single-Phase Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Review (2020, background): “However, the negative side of this topology is unbalanced conduction losses and a restricted dc-link balance [78] which affects the whole system.”
- Automotive Traction Inverters: Current Status and Future Trends (2019, background): “Advanced studies have highlighted several aspects of the benefits of three-level inverters [21], [22].”
- The Benefits of SiC mosfets in a T-Type Inverter for Grid-Tie Applications (2017, background): “However, the T-type topology must consequently use semiconductors with higher voltage ratings for its outer switches since they now have to block the full dc link voltage, which means that its semiconductor switching losses are generally higher compared to a NPC converter at the same switching frequ”
- An Extremely High Efficient Three-Level Active Neutral-Point-Clamped Converter Comprising SiC and Si Hybrid Power Stages (2018, background): “Comparative works can be found in [8] and [9].”